There has been one heck of a diplomatic row recently between Poland, Hungary, and the USA, about remarks made by the current Director of the F.B.I James B. Comey regarding the alleged involvement of the two European countries in the WW 2 Holocaust.
Envoys have been summoned, apologies and retractions have been demanded, and retribution sought over such claims as were made; and, at first glance, why not, especially when you read the comments made below.
“In their minds, the murderers and accomplices of Germany, and Poland, and Hungary, and so many, many other places didn’t do something evil. They convinced themselves it was the right thing to do, the thing they had to do. “
They are indeed most unpleasant comments, and, as happened, they could be deemed grossly inappropriate if not downright inoffensive, but I wonder what the response would have been if the following had been said
” In their minds those connected with the active or inactive pursuance of the Holocaust didn’t do something evil. They convinced themselves it was the right thing to do, the thing they had to do. “
This is in part a hypothetical question, as such comments, on this occasion, were not made, but I suspect that very few protests would have been made. Why so, well, for various reasons, but might not the principal reason be that by such carefully chosen words no-one would have had to feel guilty about anything, or to have metaphorically washed their hands.
When bad things happen, and are pinned to any group or individual one of following responses generally occur
- It wasn’t me/us
- We were only following orders
- It’s history, and time to move on
- They were worse than me/us
- Even if we were part of the problem, there were extenuating circumstances
What you will generally not hear is
- Directly or indirectly we were part of the problem
- Following orders can be a cop out, and an excuse for inaction
- It is history, but we must accept and learn from history in order to truly move on
- Two wrongs don’t make a right
- Extenuating circumstances, however relevant at the time, cannot remove us from the equation
Why so, because such statements irrevocably bind us to something that we often do not want to listen to, to face up to, or to believe. As such how many of us, faced with such facts or allegations, have got the strength to stand tall, as adults, and openly see an alternate point of view?
I suspect very few of us, for are we not at times like children who always want to play out in the long grass and the sun? We know, even as children, that it has to rain at times, and that there will be repercussions when we return dirty and grass stained from rolling around in the sun, but we still hold onto a dream of endless summers, and happy smiling mums who won’t get cross as yet another load of washing goes into the machine.
When I first heard of this story I , like many others, frowned and wondered what on earth was going on. Yet what do we see when we dig a little deeper. Sure, the comments that are at the centre of this post were awkward, and I feel misjudged, if not downright inflammatory, and a man in his position should have known better, but I would say two things in his defence.
One is that many individuals or groups outside of Germany were active supporters of the Holocaust, and many others by passivity or wilful ignorance were in part to blame. Off course others were exemplary in the defence of the Jewish and other Peoples during such a period of history, and their work and courage should be recognised to the full, but the stain of the Holocaust simply doesn’t stop at the geographical borders of Germany. To this day, the tentacles of hatred, ignorance, bigotry, racism, and intolerance, still keep growing, and if we ignore them, might they not eventually smother us all?
Secondly how many of us have actually taken time to read his statements in full?
I have done so, and it is with his words, with one aforementioned alteration, (see blue italic) that I draw this post to a close. Why so, because regardless of race, creed, religion, sexuality, or lifestyle persuasion, I feel it has a message for us all.
No animations this time folks, and no relaxing music. Just a few well chosen words
This commentary is adapted from a speech given Wednesday at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s 2015 National Tribute Dinner.
I believe that the Holocaust is the most significant event in human history. And I mean “significant” in two different ways.
It is, of course, significant because it was the most horrific display in world history of inhumanity, one that simply defies words and challenges meaning. I was born into an Irish Catholic family in this great, wonderful and safe country, but the Holocaust has always haunted me, and it has long stood as a stumbling block to faith.
How could such a thing be? How is that consistent with the concept of a loving God? How is that in any way reconcilable with the notion of a God with a role in human history? How could there possibly be meaning in life, when so many lives were snuffed out in such a fashion?
I have asked those questions since I was a young teenager. I have asked them my entire life. I asked the same questions standing in the pit at Ground Zero in early 2002. I have asked those questions many times as I have confronted unimaginable suffering and loss.
And I know I am in good company asking such questions. Last month, on a flight home from Eastern Europe, I reread Viktor Frankl’s wrenching “Man’s Search for Meaning,” in which he seeks to find meaning in suffering and loving, among other things.
And going much farther back, back before I was a religious studies major in college, I recalled the voice from the whirlwind in the Book of Job, rebuking us for even asking the question “Why?” “How dare you!” the voice seems to say. “It is not for you to ask, it is not for you to know.”
And yet I ask, as so many of us do. And I still don’t know.
But I do know this: I know it is our duty, our obligation, to make sure some good comes from unimaginable bad. Not so we can comfort ourselves by saying, “Oh, that was worth it then.” That’s nonsense. That would be perverse. It will never be “worth it.”
Instead, I believe it is simply our duty to do that, and I believe this is truth no matter where you come from on a philosophical or religious spectrum. Our obligation is to refuse to let bad win, to refuse to let evil hold the field. As Abraham Lincoln said on a field of unimaginable pain and loss, it is essential “that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain.” Our resolution does not justify the loss, but we simply cannot be alive and give up.
There are so many ways to fight evil to ensure it doesn’t hold the field. Some do this through public service that can involve actual physical battles against evil; others by different kinds of service, including the service of teaching a world what happened, teaching a world what is true.
The Holocaust was, as I said, the most horrific display in world history of inhumanity. But it was also the most horrific display in world history of our humanity, of our capacity for evil and for moral surrender.
And that second significance is the reason I require every new FBI special agent and intelligence analyst to go to the Holocaust Museum. Naturally, I want them to learn about abuse of authority on a breathtaking scale. But I want them to confront something more painful and more dangerous: I want them to see humanity and what we are capable of.
I want them to see that, although this slaughter was led by sick and evil people, those sick and evil leaders were joined by, and followed by, people who loved their families, took soup to a sick neighbor, went to church and gave to charity.
Good people helped murder millions. And that’s the most frightening lesson of all — that our very humanity made us capable of, even susceptible to, surrendering our individual moral authority to the group, where it can be hijacked by evil. Of being so cowed by those in power. Of convincing ourselves of nearly anything.
In their minds those connected with the active or inactive pursuance of the Holocaust didn’t do something evil. They convinced themselves it was the right thing to do, the thing they had to do. “didn’t do something evil. They convinced themselves it was the right thing to do, the thing they had to do. That’s what people do. And that should truly frighten us.
That is why I send our agents and our analysts to the Holocaust Museum. I want them to stare at us and realize our capacity for rationalization and moral surrender. I want them to walk out of that great museum treasuring the constraint and oversight of divided government, the restriction of the rule of law, the binding of a free and vibrant press. I want them to understand that all of this is necessary as a check on us because of the way we are. We must build it, we must know it and we must nurture it now, so that it can save us later. That is the only path to the responsible exercise of power.
Read more on this issue:
Charles Krauthammer: Do we really mean ‘never again’?
Michael Gerson: The Holocaust is not a he-said, she-said debate
Laurence Weinbaum: Chilling truths about Poland’s wartime history
Categories: Reality Checks